Posted by Mabry Tyson on January 14, 2004 at 05:12:33:
In Reply to: Re: Gun #9 - damaged posted by Mabry Tyson on February 27, 2003 at 06:29:24:
Eggleston(1916) wrote: "Lieutenant Davidson, in direct command of the disabled guns, continued to fight with what was left of them while the battle lasted."
This would mean that gun #3 was damaged as well.
This contradicts Buchanan's statement that Kevil's gun was damaged. However, this makes some sense. But Buchanan's statement was more contemporary.
Post a Followup