Gun #9 (or #3?) possibly damaged


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Web Discussion Board for cssvirginia.org ] [ FAQ ]
[Please read: Security/Privacy]

Posted by Mabry Tyson on January 14, 2004 at 05:12:33:

In Reply to: Re: Gun #9 - damaged posted by Mabry Tyson on February 27, 2003 at 06:29:24:

Eggleston(1916) wrote: "Lieutenant Davidson, in direct command of the disabled guns, continued to fight with what was left of them while the battle lasted."


This would mean that gun #3 was damaged as well.
This contradicts Buchanan's statement that Kevil's gun was damaged. However, this makes some sense. But Buchanan's statement was more contemporary.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Web Discussion Board for cssvirginia.org ] [ FAQ ]
[Please read: Security/Privacy]