Re: Gun #3 (or #9) damaged?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Web Discussion Board for cssvirginia.org ] [ FAQ ]
[Please read: Security/Privacy]

Posted by Mabry Tyson on January 14, 2004 at 05:11:33:

In Reply to: Gun #3 posted by Mabry Tyson on February 27, 2003 at 03:37:14:

Eggleston(1916) wrote: "Lieutenant Davidson, in direct command of the disabled guns, continued to fight with what was left of them while the battle lasted."


This would mean that gun #3 was damaged as well.
This contradicts Buchanan's statement that Kevil's gun was damaged. However, this makes some sense. But Buchanan's statement was more contemporary.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Web Discussion Board for cssvirginia.org ] [ FAQ ]
[Please read: Security/Privacy]